The month of
August is a time of excitement in the football calendar as it heralds the start
of a new campaign. It also brings an industry spike to the world of football
that reverberates throughout all levels of the game. With a new season on the
horizon each club is looking to prepare itself for the up-coming crusade, leaving
no stone un-turned in their quest for success. Players return after the summer
break in a variety of conditions; some looking to increase their fitness levels
after a period of rest, some easing their way back into training after the
rigors of the World Cup, and some looking to acclimatize to a new surrounding
& teammates. Coaches have the opportunity to imprint a new playing style, develop
an old one or bring about a new culture to the club. The new season affords the
management & playing staff the chance of a fresh start, having had time to fully
calibrate their thinking over the summer months. All of these on field matters
are of course very important to the loyal fan base, but what of those activities
that go on away from the field? The Summer transfer market is not a new concept
by any means, but it lends itself to the backdrop of the game & often can
make or break a season before its even kicked off. In this piece I intend to
explore why the transfer market is so rife at this time of year & why
having the best team off the field is as important as those who play upon it.
The transfer
system is largely driven by natural market forces, however new regulatory
measures have rendered player trading to small pockets of time throughout the
year. In effect this has heightened the need to recruit in numbers, such is the
lack of ability to make up for any moves that may result in failure. Conversely
this has increased the willingness to sell, as clubs do not want to carry players
who are deemed surplus to requirement. Where this leaves us is in a state of
flux which see's many clubs resort to any number of different transfer
strategies. Club's may wish to shift a group of underutilized players from
their wage bill in order to fund 1 larger purchase, the "marquee"
signing if you will. In contrast 1 large player sale could enable said club to
strengthen a number of other positions. Recent examples have been the Bale
& Suarez moves to Spain. Regardless of a club's strategy upon entering the
transfer period, cost & spending are often variables that are extremely
hard to control. Market forces tell us that a simple set of guidelines should allow
us to derive value.....not so simple on planet football. Form, age, competing
league, international appearances, honors...all of these would seem rational to
the novice, however further factors also can come into play. Has the buying
club just sold a player for lots of money? Has the player been on the end of 1
too many tabloid headlines? Is the buying club familiar with said player's
agent, who can enhance the deal? Gone are the days when a club's manager would
simply pick up the phone & agree a trade off with the selling clubs gaffer.
In board rooms & admin offices across the world, there is another team of
individuals that have the responsibility to perform well for their club. This
team must work diligently to construct any number of player deals that are
completed swiftly, professionally, and leaves all parties with a sense of
content. It could be argued that those clubs with a strong Chief Executive
& business model will transfer those qualities onto the field. "Closing
the deal" as it were, is an all together more complex affair, but again it
lends itself to what is modern day
football....a series of business transactions.
The PR
machine that follows football has become as sophisticated & robust as any
high profile political propaganda. This carries with it a following of fans
that are colored by daily updates, largely built from conjecture. Those in the
media may establish a failed bid as a "Lack of ambition", leading to
accusations of a low funding board. Manchester United famously missed out on
numerous deals at the start of the Moyes era, which lead to much instability
and a negative mindset to start the season within its fan base. Most Clubs want
to enter into any negotiation with an heir of fiscal strength, but equally they
are duty bound to be mindful & prudent. Paying too much in a transfer fee
can often place unnecessary pressure onto the player, citing questions about
their early form. Many examples can be drawn upon here, however the best
illustration of this has to be Fernando Torres switch to Chelsea. The
Spaniard's free flowing & creative Liverpool form seems to have totally
evaporated under the weight of his vast price tag. Such is the power of the
media, those within the game are also regular proponents of the use of
"spin". Selling clubs have been known to leak certain transfer bids
to the media, often as a mechanism to enhance interest in a particular player
& increase his market value. It's also been known that a club will report a
"phantom bid" to the media, acting as a pseudo statement of intent
that they've set their sights high. This is a tactic that some board members
use to cajole their "want-away" stars, who naturally they would
rather keep at the club. We've also become extremely familiar with the news tag
line that a player is "handing in a formal transfer request" at the
behest of his new suitors. Often this is a tactic to put pressure on his club,
ultimately forcing through a deal. As you can see the reporting of transfer
activity plays a pivotal role in proceedings, often parlaying itself into the
end result. Clubs use the media to control their PR, but at times not even
those outlets can control the feverish view point carried by football fans. It
seems an age ago that Arsenal offered £1 over Luis Suarez reported £40M buyout
clause. To those who were part of the bid I can only assume they felt the £40M
was a substantial signal of intent, and heralded a new dawn in their transfer
policy. The addition of the £1 however appeared as contrived to the viewing
public and placed Arsenal within a position of weakness within the deal. Fickle
as it may seem, it's this attention to detail that can often be the making or
breaking of a transfer.
Throughout
my time as a football fan I mandate the following policy: I'll believe it when I see it. Only when my team's newest star is
posing with the club scarf will I fully accept the signing as fact. All too
often we hear of nearly signings or late call offs. I remember as a child being
utterly beside myself at the thought of Glasgow Rangers signing Mario Jardel. The
bustling Brazilian goal machine had all but signed for the club, and was even
paraded in front of the fans before completing his deal the next day. I'd read
all about him in World Soccer magazine & had watched him bang in goals for Porto
in the Champions League. Now I was ready for his assault on the Scottish
league, only to hear that the deal had been scuppered when it appeared
complications had arisen during his medical. In my 11 year old mind our season
was over. How were we expected to score goals now if Jardel wasn't signing? McCoist
can't do it all himself I thought! This case a side, it's extremely easy for
supporters to place a certain element of faith within a new signing, or get
caught up in the need to spend money at all! Transfer spending can carry the
hopes and dreams of a football community...a symbol of change....a sign of
optimism. What other mechanism in football can carry such emotion? There simply
isn't one. A signing policy however is only as strong as those who can execute
the deals. Therefore we cannot underestimate the importance of a strong
business team. We as football fans are adept in understanding the shop
front....the tactics, the players, the decisions....but what of the activities
behind the scenes? Most of the deals that take place remain confidential, which
spurns its own level of media frenzy. Would our game be better off if we as
fans were given transparency as to the level of spending our clubs take part
in? Would this in some way allow us to evaluate the transfer with greater
clarity? Perhaps. The individual transfer aside, it would allow us to form an
educated assessment of our CEO's & Chief Exec's performance. They are after
all spending a large part of our collective investment, surely we should be
privy to where these funds are being placed? If football is to continue its
evolution in a positive manner we as supporters have to ask more questions of
our clubs performance, and not just those that take place between the white
lines. We don't have to be qualified accountancy experts, nor do we require a
keen eye for evaluating tax returns to evaluate where our Clubs are headed. We
as fans are the clubs vision, we form the expectation levels &
ultimately it's us that our club
leaders are establishing an understanding with. Unity among a fan base is both
rare & largely ideological, but I am certain we can all share in the notion
that we want to experience many more transfer windows to come. It's therefore
important that we reduce cat calling for check books to be opened, or base the
legitimacy of our clubs signing policy upon its ranking in the overall spend
table. Longevity & stability are commodities that are often overlooked in
football, but we as fans have to embody the future of the game....a future that
we will all enjoy. At it's very core professional football is a business, and one that requires all forms of support. As its
largest share holders we need to ensure our stock does not plummet, but serves
to benefactor all of the glories & grandeur this magnificent game brings us
all.